EFFECTIVENESS OF LOW VERSUS HIGH DOSE STATINS FOR REDUCING MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

EFEKTIVITAS STATIN DOSIS RENDAH DAN TINGGI TERHADAP KEJADIAN KARDIOVASKULAR MAYOR: SUATU TINJAUAN SISTEMATISDAN META-ANALISIS

  • Khairuman Fitrah Ananda Hermina General Hospital, Medan
  • Abigail Christine Sarumpaet Bandung Adventist Hospital, Bandung
  • Agustina Sianturi Cardiovascular Unit, Hermina General Hospital, Medan
Keywords: statins, coronary heart disease, MACE, meta-analysis

Abstract

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a leading cause of global mortality. Statins are first-line therapy for reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); however, the optimal dosing strategy remains debated, particularly between ACC/AHA guidelines recommending high-dose statins and ESC guidelines favoring a stepwise approach. Asian populations with SLCO1B1 gene polymorphisms are at increased risk for statin-related adverse effects, such as myopathy and hepatotoxicity. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose versus low-dose statins in reducing MACE among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus (2020–2025). Ten studies (n = 43,985) were included in the final analysis. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Funnel plot asymmetry suggested potential publication bias. High-dose statins significantly reduced MACE risk (RR 0.85; p = 0.004) and LDL-C levels, but increased myopathy (OR 2.3) and hepatotoxicity risks, especially in SLCO1B1 polymorphism carriers. Low-dose statins plus ezetimibe achieved comparable LDL-C reduction with fewer adverse events. High-dose statin therapy significantly increased the relative risk of myopathy (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.8–2.9), particularly in genetically susceptible individuals. Conclusion: High-dose statins improve cardiovascular outcomes but require close monitoring. Low-dose statins with ezetimibe offer a safer alternative, supporting personalized therapy based on genetic and clinical factors.

References

Wardiyana W, Herawati T. Changes in Healthy Living Behavior in Heart Disease Patients Based on Smartphone Game Applications. JHCN J Heal Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;3(2):1-10. doi:10.36082/jhcn.v3i2.1462

Muniyappa R, Narayanappa SBK. Disentangling Dual Threats: Premature Coronary Artery Disease and Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in South Asians. J Endocr Soс. 2024;1(1):2024. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad167

Budoff MJ. Coronary Artery Calcium: An Equal Opportunity Predictor. JACC Asia. 2021;1(1):103–104. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.05.007

Baranowski M, Jabkowski P. Gender and socioeconomic patterns of selfreported sleep problems across European countries. Eur J Public Heal. 2023;33(1):242-248. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad012

Fujishima Y. The Effects of Topiroxostat, a Selective Xanthine Oxidoreductase Inhibitor, on Arterial Stiffness in Hyperuricemic Patients with Liver Dysfunction: A Sub-Analysis of the BEYOND-UA Study. Biomedicines. 2023;1(1):203-210. doi:10.3390/biomedicines11030674

Mach F. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Hear J. 2020;41(2):111-188. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455

Hong SJ. Comparison of Low-Dose vs High-Dose Statin Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;1(3):512-517. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.2487

Zhao Z, Tu Y, Song H. The efficacy and safety of high-intensity statin therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysi. Med. 2022;101(12):e29059. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000029059

Silverman MG, Ference BA, Im K. Association between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reduction among different therapeutic interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;16(12):1289-1297. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.13985

Banach M, Patti AM, Giglio R V. The role of statin therapy in cardiovascular disease prevention: current evidence and future directions. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(1):1-15. doi:10.1038/s41569-022-00758-2

Sabatine MS. High-Intensity Statins vs. Moderate-Intensity in Diabetic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;44(11):972-983. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00231-1

Wang Y. Safety of High-Dose Statins in East Asian Populations: Insights from a Multicenter Registry. O’clock Hear Assoc. 2022;1(6):5-10. doi:10.1136/heartasia-2022-011193

Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016;388(1):2532-2561. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5

Lee JH. SLCO1B1 Genotype-Guided Statin Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Precise Genomics Med. Published online 2024. doi:10.1161/CIRCGEN.123.003678

Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Hear J. 2020;4(1):111-188. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455

Puri R, Nissen SE, Somaratne R, et al. Impact of PCSK9 inhibition on coronary atheroma progression: Rationale and design of Global Assessment of Plaque Regression with a PCSK9 Antibody as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound (GLAGOV). Am Heart J. 2016;176(1):83-92. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.014

Armitage J, Baigent C, Barnes E, et al. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):407-415. doi:10.1016/S0140 6736(18)31942 1

Page M. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMЈ. 2021;37(2):15-25. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

Bach F. High-intensity versus moderate-intensity statin treatment for patients with ischemic stroke: Nationwide cohort study. Eur Stroke J. 2023;8(1):1041-1052. doi:10.1177/23969873231193288

Chehrevar M. Effects of High- or Moderate-intensity Rosuvastatin on 1- year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Post-percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interv Cardiol Rev Res Resort. 2022;1(1):68-75. doi:10.15420/icr.2022.13

Choe J. Effect of High-Intensity Rosuvastatin vs. Combination of LowIntensity Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe on HbA1c Levels in Patients without Diabetes: A Randomized IDEAL Trial. J Clin Med. 2023;12(1):1–13. doi:10.3390/jcm12186099

Choi H. Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial From Korea. J Atheroscler Lipids. 2023;12(1):277–289. doi:10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.277

Hong K. Moderate-Intensity Rosuvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus HighIntensity Rosuvastatin to Target Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Achievement in Patients With Recent Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Stroke. 2023;25(1):242–250. doi:10.5853/jos.2022.02957

Ishii J. Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Risk in Statin-Treated Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022;29(1):1458-1474. doi:10.5551/jat.63229

Jackowska P. The influence of statin monotherapy and statin-ezetimibe combined therapy on FoxP3 and IL 10 mRNA expression in patients with coronary artery disease. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(1):1243–1248. doi:10.17219/acem/108627

Jang JY. Comparative effectiveness of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(5):1–9. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51310-5

Kim J., Choi J, Kim S., Kim NH. Relative contribution of statin intensity, achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and statin therapy duration to cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes: population based cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(5):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12933 022 01472 z

Liu Q, Wang Y, Cheng X. The functional effect of atorvastatin dose dependent via inflammation factors on acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiovasc Med. 2019;21(5):215-219. doi:10.2459/JCM.0000000000000711

Oh M. Comparison of High-Dose Rosuvastatin Versus Low-Dose Rosuvastatin Plus Ezetimibe on Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Inflammation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2020;13(6):900-907. doi:10.1007/s12265 020 10072 1

Roy D. Comparing effectiveness of high-dose Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin among patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A non-concurrent cohort study in India. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233230

Published
2026-01-01
How to Cite
Ananda, K. F., Sarumpaet, A. C., & Sianturi, A. (2026). EFFECTIVENESS OF LOW VERSUS HIGH DOSE STATINS FOR REDUCING MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS: EFEKTIVITAS STATIN DOSIS RENDAH DAN TINGGI TERHADAP KEJADIAN KARDIOVASKULAR MAYOR: SUATU TINJAUAN SISTEMATISDAN META-ANALISIS. Ibnu Sina: Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan - Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, 25(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.30743/ibnusina.v25i1.981
Section
Research Article