PENGALAMAN PENGGUNAAN PRODUK ESTETIKA BERBAHAN DASAR HERBAL: STUDI ETNOGRAFI PADA KOMUNITAS PERAWATAN KULIT TRADISIONAL

USER EXPERIENCE OF HERBAL-BASED AESTHETIC PRODUCTS: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF A TRADITIONAL SKINCARE COMMUNITY

  • Nita Andrini Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi pengalaman subjektif anggota komunitas perawatan kulit tradisional dalam menggunakan produk estetika berbahan dasar herbal. Pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode etnografi virtual (netnografi) diterapkan selama lima bulan pada dua komunitas daring, melibatkan 22 partisipan melalui wawancara mendalam dan observasi partisipan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tiga tema utama. Pertama, motif peralihan dari produk konvensional ke herbal didominasi oleh reaksi kulit sensitif (81,8%), tradisi keluarga (68,2%), dan kesadaran lingkungan (63,6%). Kedua, ritual penggunaan herbal melibatkan enam tahapan dengan durasi 15-30 menit, menghadirkan pengalaman multi-sensori yang bersifat meditatif dan membangkitkan memori otobiografis. Ketiga, komunitas ini tidak meninggalkan rasionalitas ilmiah; 86,4% partisipan secara aktif memvalidasi pengetahuan tradisional melalui jurnal penelitian, menciptakan epistemik hibrida di mana warisan leluhur dan sains modern saling menguatkan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penggunaan produk herbal merupakan praktik budaya kompleks yang menggabungkan ingatan kolektif, ritual sensorik, dan negosiasi pengetahuan. Implikasi praktisnya, pengembangan produk lokal berbasis herbal perlu mempertimbangkan makna ritualistik dan nilai kultural, bukan hanya aspek fungsional. Pelestarian pengetahuan tradisional yang adaptif terhadap validasi ilmiah direkomendasikan untuk menjaga keberlanjutan kearifan lokal.

References

1. Amberg, N., & Fogarassy, C. (2019). Green consumer behavior in the cosmetics market. Resources, 8(3), 137. doi: 10.3390/resources8030137
2. Appadurai, A. (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.
3. Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory: Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868–882. doi: 10.1086/426626
4. Batubara, I., & Prastya, M. E. (2020). Potential use of Indonesian medicinal plants for cosmetic and oral health: A review. Jurnal Kimia Valensi, 6(1), 119–134. doi: 10.15408/jkv.v6i1.16252
5. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
9. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Management Decision, 51(1), 63–82. doi: 10.1108/00251741311291319
10. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
11. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12. Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford University Press.
13. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
14. Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.
15. Javandira, C. (2025). Ethnobotanical insights and quantitative evaluation of medicinal plant utilization in traditional cosmetic practices: A community-centered study. Bali Medical and Wellness Journal, 2(1). doi: 10.71341/bmwj.v2i1.34
16. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
17. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. SAGE Publications.
18. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
19. Kumar, R. (2017). Botanical cosmeceuticals for skin care. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Archive, 8(4). doi: 10.22377/ijpba.v8i04.1532
20. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
21. Miller, D. (1987). Material culture and mass consumption. Basil Blackwell.
22. Muniz, A. M., Jr., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432. doi: 10.1086/319618
23. Nurrosyidah, I. H., Kusumaningrum, Y. D., & Isnaeni, I. (2026). A review: The efficacy of Indonesian traditional herbal remedies in beauty and skincare. Current Traditional Medicine, 12, e22150838327030. doi: 10.2174/0122150838327030241224081452
24. O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
25. Peniwidiyanti, P., Hasanah, I. F., & Rahayu, M. (2026). The utilization of cosmetic plants: An ethnobotanical study in Indonesia. Al-Kauniyah: Jurnal Biologi, 19(1), 43–51. doi: 10.15408/kauniyah.v19i1.41864
26. Ramos Mendonça, B. M., Alves, P. E., & Santos, E. P. (2023). Green cosmetics: Bibliographic review about the sustainable trend in cosmetics development. Research, Society and Development, 12(2), e4212239888. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v12i2.39888
27. Rook, D. W. (1985). The ritual dimension of consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 251–264. doi: 10.1086/208514
28. Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 21–39. doi: 10.1007/s11747-010-0216-3
29. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
30. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Published
2026-07-22
Section
Artikel Penelitian